Q2 2026 Leadership 360

Model: Northwind Leadership Competency Model v3 · 184 reviewees · 1,412 reviewers invited

Reviewees enrolled

184

+12 this week

Nomination coverage

92%

8 reviewees below threshold

Reviewer response rate

73.5%

+4.2% vs last pilot

Reports generated

96 / 184

52% complete

Comms activity

4 bulletins live · last sent Mar 12 · 82% avg open - evidence the cohort is being actively shepherded, not just measured.

Competency composite | self vs. others

Cohort average across the Northwind Leadership Competency Model (scale 1–5).

Self vs. others gap

Largest perception gaps shape the leadership story.

Coaching Others

+0.6

Strategic Thinking

+0.5

Driving Change

+0.5

Decision Making

+0.4

Inclusive Leadership

+0.2

Operational Excellence

+0.2

Commercial Acumen

-0.1

Score by region

Average 'others' score, with sample size.

Score by function

Same lens, sliced across functional lines.

Score by Division / Department

Toggle to drill from Division into its Departments. Division score is the n-weighted mean of its departments.

Score by Team, competency heatmap

Team × Competency 'others' scores (1–5). Teams with fewer than 3 reviewees are suppressed to protect anonymity.

Team	Manager	n	Strategic Thinking	Decision Making	Coaching Others	Inclusive Leadership	Driving Change
EMEA Sales	A. Müller	9	3.9	4.0	3.2	3.9	3.6
NA Sales	J. Carter	11	4.1	4.2	3.4	4.0	3.8
Brand & Marketing	L. Okafor	8	3.7	3.6	3.5	4.1	3.5
Customer Success	R. Tan	7	3.4	3.5	3.8	4.0	3.3
Plant Ops EU	S. Novák	10	3.5	4.0	2.9	3.6	3.4
Supply Chain	M. Patel	9	3.8	3.9	3.1	3.7	3.6
Engineering Platform	K. Sato	8	3.0	3.3	2.6	3.4	2.9
Data & AI	P. Iyer	6	3.6	3.5	3.0	3.7	3.4
IT Platform APAC	C. Wong	2	n<3	n<3	n<3	n<3	n<3
People & Culture	E. Dubois	7	3.8	3.7	4.2	4.3	3.7
Finance Leadership	H. Schmidt	9	3.7	3.9	3.0	3.6	3.4

Darker = stronger. Cohort midpoint ≈ 3.6.